Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Libraries"
(→Lexicographic ordering of version string: new section) |
(lost libraries. purge them?) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
If we'd want to sort the list based on the supported löve version (from newest to oldest), 0.10 will not be at the top, before 0.9, because the list is ordered lexicographically. | If we'd want to sort the list based on the supported löve version (from newest to oldest), 0.10 will not be at the top, before 0.9, because the list is ordered lexicographically. | ||
Is this a non-issue or could something be done? (using 0.0x format for versions in this list older than 0.10 for example?)--[[User:Zorg|Zorg]] ([[User talk:Zorg|talk]]) 04:55, 29 August 2016 (CEST) | Is this a non-issue or could something be done? (using 0.0x format for versions in this list older than 0.10 for example?)--[[User:Zorg|Zorg]] ([[User talk:Zorg|talk]]) 04:55, 29 August 2016 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | There are lost libraries which seem to be completly lost like "popo", because they were not on github. There are other ones, which are on github, but they were renamed on github. Pinko 13:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:23, 22 September 2023
how can i add an library here, since the page is locked? Dusoft
- Put this at the bottom of your page:
{{#set:LOVE Version=0.9.0}}
{{#set:Description=My awesome library.}}
[[Category:Libraries]]
- -- Technocat
Lexicographic ordering of version string
If we'd want to sort the list based on the supported löve version (from newest to oldest), 0.10 will not be at the top, before 0.9, because the list is ordered lexicographically. Is this a non-issue or could something be done? (using 0.0x format for versions in this list older than 0.10 for example?)--Zorg (talk) 04:55, 29 August 2016 (CEST)
There are lost libraries which seem to be completly lost like "popo", because they were not on github. There are other ones, which are on github, but they were renamed on github. Pinko 13:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
