Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tutorial:Bounding Box Collision Detection"
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This isn't really a tutorial is it? This should be replaced with a more robust explanation and collision detection solution. [[User:TechnoCat|TechnoCat]] | This isn't really a tutorial is it? This should be replaced with a more robust explanation and collision detection solution. [[User:TechnoCat|TechnoCat]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. The self-promotion thing was by accident. | ||
| + | 2. I am not biased towards [[love.physics]], I meant that if you want complicated stuff like circular collision, this was not the way to go. | ||
| + | 3. I only had five minutes to write this, so I did not have much time to do any explaining. | ||
Revision as of 18:25, 22 June 2010
Opinion about love.physics
The writer seems very biased towards using love.physics, is this permitted? Bartbes 21:49, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
This isn't really a tutorial is it? This should be replaced with a more robust explanation and collision detection solution. TechnoCat
1. The self-promotion thing was by accident. 2. I am not biased towards love.physics, I meant that if you want complicated stuff like circular collision, this was not the way to go. 3. I only had five minutes to write this, so I did not have much time to do any explaining.
