Difference between revisions of "Talk:Game Distribution"
m (Created page with "== Love2D compiler == Is that still available? The link sends me to a bare bones site.") |
(Suggestion about improvement of Windows compilation algorithm.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == | + | |
| − | + | == Easier compilation under Windows? == | |
| + | |||
| + | To say, it is possible to compile games under Windows in a simpler way, by making a bat file with contents defined as | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''<tt style="font-size:1.3em"> copy /b love.exe+%1 "%~n1.exe"</tt>'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | , placing it in LOVE directory, and just dragging game's .zip\.love onto it to compile them.<sup>[http://www.yellow.indieis.me/2012/01/23/love2d-simple-compilation-to-exe/ entire post]</sup> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Maybe this should be included in the main article? Seems better than opening a cmd for every compilation or downloading third-party executable. --[[User:Yellowafterlife|Yellowafterlife]] 21:32, 23 January 2012 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:32, 23 January 2012
Easier compilation under Windows?
To say, it is possible to compile games under Windows in a simpler way, by making a bat file with contents defined as
copy /b love.exe+%1 "%~n1.exe"
, placing it in LOVE directory, and just dragging game's .zip\.love onto it to compile them.entire post
Maybe this should be included in the main article? Seems better than opening a cmd for every compilation or downloading third-party executable. --Yellowafterlife 21:32, 23 January 2012 (GMT)
