Difference between revisions of "User:Subrime"
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
from irc:loveclub | from irc:loveclub | ||
+ | |||
subrime: | subrime: | ||
+ | |||
I have an idea | I have an idea | ||
add a love.graphics.gradient function that can stand in for a series of colours in setColor | add a love.graphics.gradient function that can stand in for a series of colours in setColor | ||
Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
does this cover what you were envisioning? | does this cover what you were envisioning? | ||
+ | |||
anjo: | anjo: | ||
+ | |||
actually, yes it does, and quite nicely. | actually, yes it does, and quite nicely. | ||
+ | |||
+ | This formatting is wrong, and the location as well, but anyway, I do not agree with setColor(gradient()), I really prefer setColorGradient() and not having to expose a Gradient type. --[[User:Bartbes|Bartbes]] 11:14, 30 March 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:14, 30 March 2010
ideas for gradients in love:
from irc:loveclub
subrime:
I have an idea add a love.graphics.gradient function that can stand in for a series of colours in setColor
the gradient function can take things like a direction and two colours and it returns the correct seties of rgba values for setColor
eg setcolor(love.graphics.gradient(red,yellow,math.pi/3))
if the number of colour points set is 4 and is different from the number of vertices being drawn, fit a bounding rectangle and moodulate with its gradient
does this cover what you were envisioning?
anjo:
actually, yes it does, and quite nicely.
This formatting is wrong, and the location as well, but anyway, I do not agree with setColor(gradient()), I really prefer setColorGradient() and not having to expose a Gradient type. --Bartbes 11:14, 30 March 2010 (UTC)