Difference between revisions of "FAQ"
(Created page with "Common questions newbies might have about LÖVE == Why doesn't LÖVE include a vector library? == slime wrote: <blockquote> The main problem with LÖVE's APIs using vector...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Common questions newbies might have about LÖVE | Common questions newbies might have about LÖVE | ||
| + | |||
| + | == How did LÖVE come to exist? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | rude [http://blogs.love2d.org/content/l%C3%B6vely-interviews-rude wrote]: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote> | ||
| + | Actually, I don't remember how it started. Possibly it was just a challenge to myself. If someone forced me to make up a story, however, it could be something like: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well, I was looking for a free 2D-centric game framework that was easy to get up and running, and that would work on all platforms without too much hassle, but I couldn't find any. There were many engines and frameworks available, but they were too focused on 3D, which made the API unattractive for use in 2D games. So I began to work on my own API; a glorious world blissfully ignorant of the z-axis, where the children could finally laugh and play freely, both as in beer, and as in freedom. *single tear* | ||
| + | |||
| + | And so forth. | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
== Why doesn't LÖVE include a vector library? == | == Why doesn't LÖVE include a vector library? == | ||
| − | slime wrote: | + | slime [https://love2d.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=81457&start=50#p193807 wrote]: |
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| Line 11: | Line 23: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| − | + | [https://love2d.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=82815 More discussion] | |
Latest revision as of 02:39, 29 August 2016
Common questions newbies might have about LÖVE
How did LÖVE come to exist?
rude wrote:
Actually, I don't remember how it started. Possibly it was just a challenge to myself. If someone forced me to make up a story, however, it could be something like:
Well, I was looking for a free 2D-centric game framework that was easy to get up and running, and that would work on all platforms without too much hassle, but I couldn't find any. There were many engines and frameworks available, but they were too focused on 3D, which made the API unattractive for use in 2D games. So I began to work on my own API; a glorious world blissfully ignorant of the z-axis, where the children could finally laugh and play freely, both as in beer, and as in freedom. *single tear*
And so forth.
Why doesn't LÖVE include a vector library?
slime wrote:
The main problem with LÖVE's APIs using vector objects is that in Lua, vector objects tend to create a lot of garbage if used heavily. So having them required for using LÖVE functions prevents optimal performance. Some engines go to extreme lengths to try to work around that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTjyM7d7_YA#t=23m6s
I don't want to make vector-specific function variants either, as that would make the API a lot messier.
