fixture:setMask requiring two arguments

[pandna]

I have a fixture that I'd like to add a mask to, I'm using VSCode, and it looks like it's interpreting that the function requires two arguments. I don't have any runtime errors, and the wiki shows an example with 1 parameter. Anybody have info on how to fix this? Any reason the love2d has two params listed in the definition?

Screenshot 2024-05-02 014301.png (30.89 KiB) Viewed 2048 times

[knorke]

https://love2d.org/wiki/Fixture:setMask
Fixture:setMask( mask1, mask2, ... )
Those three dots mean there can be more arguments.
The number of arguments is flexible. It needs at least 1 argument but can take more.
The physics system supports up to 16 categories, so 16 is the upper limit.
I do not know how to fix the VSCode warning.

[dusoft]

This is not the forum for VSCode bugs. The LOVE docs are clear.

[pandna]

I'm not sure this is a VSCode bug, but more a result of how love2d has its definition. Any reason it's not just Fixture:setMask(mask1, ...)?

[slime]

While the wiki could be more clear, updating it won't fix that vscode extension. Like dusoft said it's a separate and independently developed piece of software.

[knorke]

In the screenshot, VScode uses the same text as the wiki. Did they parse the wiki somehow or is that docu created by hand?
Would it make sense to standardize the style a bit to make it more machine-readable?
For example: https://love2d.org/wiki/love.event.push writes things a bit different: a,b,c,d,e,f... instead of argument1, argument2, ...
For me, the totally normal human, either way is clear enough.

[slime]

In the screenshot, VScode uses the same text as the wiki. Did they parse the wiki somehow or is that docu created by hand?
Would it make sense to standardize the style a bit to make it more machine-readable?

I believe it's a heavily modified edit of something that originated as a wiki scrape.

I'm interested in making the wiki human-readable, which is often in conflict with making it perfectly machine-readable. Given a choice between the two I'll pick the former.

For example: https://love2d.org/wiki/love.event.push writes things a bit different: a,b,c,d,e,f... instead of argument1, argument2, ...
For me, the totally normal human, either way is clear enough.

Those are the actual argument names to the function (it's consistent with other var-arg listings in the wiki), they just don't have good names because they can have sort of arbitrary values.