windfield (easy box2d)

Showcase your libraries, tools and other projects that help your fellow love users.
Post Reply
User avatar
adnzzzzZ
Party member
Posts: 305
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:04 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brazil

windfield (easy box2d)

Post by adnzzzzZ »

This is a physics library that wraps LÖVE's box2d and makes it easier to use.

windfield
Last edited by adnzzzzZ on Fri May 26, 2017 10:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Kaldrey
Prole
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:06 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: [Library] hxdx (box2d wrapper)

Post by Kaldrey »

This seems really handy. Nicely done.
User avatar
kbmonkey
Party member
Posts: 139
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2015 12:19 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: [Library] hxdx (box2d wrapper)

Post by kbmonkey »

It does look nice indeed! I've spent plenty time creating joints and fixtures the past month. Nice!
User avatar
adnzzzzZ
Party member
Posts: 305
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:04 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brazil

Re: [Library] windfield (easy box2d)

Post by adnzzzzZ »

I've updated this library with the addition of a few functions, bug fixes and better & more clear documentation.

windfield
User avatar
Tanner
Party member
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 1:51 am

Re: windfield (easy box2d)

Post by Tanner »

If someone asked me what the most underrated Love library is, I might have to say this one. The simple API belies some really clever engineering under the hood. I hope the new documentation helps more people understand how great this is.
User avatar
Macsek
Prole
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 3:25 pm

Re: windfield (easy box2d)

Post by Macsek »

Nice
My current project uses your old library: "hxdx" It looks fairly similar to me.
What are the differences? Should I update?
User avatar
adnzzzzZ
Party member
Posts: 305
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:04 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brazil

Re: windfield (easy box2d)

Post by adnzzzzZ »

Macsek wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 6:51 pm Nice
My current project uses your old library: "hxdx" It looks fairly similar to me.
What are the differences? Should I update?
It's mostly the same but with a few bug fixes and small changes. For instance, now a collider has access to all functions of a Body and Fixture, so instead of saying something like collider.body:setLinearVelocity() you can just say collider:setLinearVelocity(), but both versions still work. I didn't document all the changes so I don't remember if they're all backwards compatible like that, but if you haven't found any issues with the previous version of the library then there's no real reason to change, as most new changes are minor.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests