LÖVE

Posted: **Sun Sep 21, 2014 1:52 am**

Ok so here is the code

function love.update(dt)
if gui.Button({text = "Test",pos = {100, 100}}) then
self:remove()
end
end

and the error

Code: Select all

main.lua:26: Attempt to index global self(a nil value)

why does self not work?

Posted: **Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:06 am**

'self' can be accessed when your are inside a function like this:

Code: Select all

obj = {}
obj.remove = function(self)
  assert(self == obj)
end

or this:

Code: Select all

obj = {}
function obj:remove()
  assert(self == obj)
end

In your case, you are trying to access "self" from the global function "love.update"

Also, there are two ways to pass the 'self' reference, explicit:

Code: Select all

obj.remove(obj)

Implicit:

Code: Select all

obj:remove()

Posted: **Sun Sep 21, 2014 8:22 am**

self can't be accessed when you're not inside a method. So basically, argument self at ivan's obj.remove function not the same as obj until you pass the function using obj as the argument to make self equals to obj like ivan said. I mean you can't accessed self to return as obj object.

Code: Select all

function obj:remove()
    self = nil
end

not the same as

Code: Select all

function obj.remove(self)
    self = nil
end

At those functions, the first one make obj as nil and the second one make self as nil not the obj.

Code: Select all

local tabletest = {}

obj.remove(tabletest)

So the obj.remove makes tabletest as nil not the obj itself.

Posted: **Sun Sep 21, 2014 9:20 am**

In this case, I think you want something like:

Code: Select all

function love.update(dt)
     if not buttonClicked then
        if gui.Button({text = "Test",pos = {100, 100}}) then
            buttonClicked = true
        end
    end
end

Posted: **Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:37 am**

To add a little (I hope) more to the explanations...

The behavior of "self" in Lua is not quite the same the behavior of self/this in say C++, Java, PHP etc. In those languages, the self/this is inherently available on any methods that are defined within the classes. It is essentially invalid to invoke the methods in a way in which self/this is not available. Unless you explicitly define a method as static, you can be assured that self/this is available.

In Lua, the situation is much murkier. "self" really only exists by convention. The ":" method invocation syntax is actually kind of a "trick," (something people like to call syntactic sugar). Honestly, I am not a big fan of this aspect of the language.

Here is a code snippet that demonstrates this point:

Code: Select all

local foo = {
        x = 5,
}

function foo.bar( self )
        if self then
                print("In bar, self exists and self.x is " .. tostring(self.x))
        else
                print("In bar, self is nil")
        end
end

function foo:czar()
        if self then
                print("In czar, self exists and self.x is " .. tostring(self.x))
        else
                print("In czar, self is nil")
        end
end

foo.bar()
foo:bar()
foo.bar(foo)

foo.czar()
foo:czar()
foo.czar(foo)

Note that the function "bar" is defined somewhat oddly. The reality is that when you define a function in Lua using the ":" operator, it's really being defined as you see "bar" defined. Thus, the definition of "czar" is equivalent to the definition of "bar." The funky thing, though, is that it's actually the invocation of the function that is key. If you don't invoke the function with the ":" operator (or explicitly pass the table you're using), then the method does not have access to "self"

This may be somewhat confusing, but if you pay close attention to this code example, it should be clear why your code is not doing what you want it to.

LÖVE

self (A nil value)

self (A nil value)

Re: self (A nil value)

Re: self (A nil value)

Re: self (A nil value)

Re: self (A nil value)