LÖVE

Well, this happened.
That errors, of course:
>'for' limit must be a number

So I go and do this:
That doesn't error! Now, go:
nan is not a number, so why is for letting me use it as a limit?

LuaWeaver wrote:nan is not a number, so why is for letting me use it as a limit?

Ah, but it is!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NaN#Encoding

Reminds me of:
> issue #666: LÖVE crashes when I try to crash it.

I've never thought of this before. It's kind of like Wine except even more obvious

ieee probably should have called it something else, like "not representable" or something

reminds me of a past thread on the lua mailing list where someone suggested lua expressions that would have resulted in nan should return nil instead, because "not a number". NOPE.