Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERUN]

General discussion about LÖVE, Lua, game development, puns, and unicorns.
Post Reply

After completing the test, what does the "You Support: ..." text say? (excluding FB sizes)

Nothing
7
10%
Framebuffers
2
3%
Framebuffers, Non-Po2 Framebuffers
0
No votes
Framebuffers, Non-Po2 Images
1
1%
Framebuffers, Non-Po2 Framebuffers, Non-Po2 Images
52
75%
Non-Po2 Images
7
10%
 
Total votes: 69
User avatar
Xgoff
Party member
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:20 am

Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU

Post by Xgoff »

TechnoCat wrote:
veethree wrote:po3 framebuffers up to 2187x2187.
That sounds very wasteful and inefficient of your driver developers to do.
i'm still puzzled over what relevance "power of 3" has to graphics hardware

anyway i support all 3 :>
Top
User avatar
TechnoCat
Inner party member
Posts: 1611
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:31 am
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Contact:
Contact TechnoCat

Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU

Post by TechnoCat »

veethree wrote:
TechnoCat wrote:
veethree wrote:po3 framebuffers up to 2187x2187.
That sounds very wasteful and inefficient of your driver developers to do.
Why's that?
It is wasteful because O(n^2) < O(n^3). Also, power of 2 is used because memory spaces are usually (always?) worded by powers of 2's.
Top
User avatar
Nixola
Inner party member
Posts: 1949
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:11 pm
Location: Italy

Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU

Post by Nixola »

That's not a driver developer's idea, it's a test writer's idea
lf = love.filesystem
ls = love.sound
la = love.audio
lp = love.physics
lt = love.thread
li = love.image
lg = love.graphics
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest