Suggestion: this thread should be killed (locked) and a new thread should be created in it's place which should mimic the "game resources" thread so that we can keep a track of what features that is wanted and so that people can know what has been said before without having to look through 8 pages of axllslslls explaining that we're doing it wrong. Now, if you'll excuse me I am coughing my lungs out so I will return later.
/mike away
Future features
Re: Future features
Now posting IN STEREO (where available)
Re: Future features
Sooner or later the thread will grow big and strong again, and we'll have the same problem.
1) It should be enough that I update the first post, or
2) We should create a separate board for feature requests and future interface discussion.
^-^)/
1) It should be enough that I update the first post, or
2) We should create a separate board for feature requests and future interface discussion.
^-^)/
- Sardtok
- Party member
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:37 pm
- Location: Norway/Norge/諾威/挪威 (Yes, I'm teh back!)
- Contact:
Re: Future features
Yes, a single board called Everything, doesn't quite cut it, and an own thread for different feature requests makes a lot of sense.rude wrote:2) We should create a separate board for feature requests and future interface discussion.
I figure you were planning on splitting this forum into different boards already, but simply hadn't found the need to yet, or what boards would be needed.
Take off every Zigg for great rapist.
Now, outgay that!
Now, outgay that!
Re: Future features
Right you are, dr. zig.... The board should be divided when the need arises. As long as there isn't that many members, it feels weird, but maybe the time is now? It's normal to gather everything in a single board as long as the member-count is low, and then expand as the need arises. In this way new members aren't frightened by the number of boards, and discussion is stimulated. Mmmmm.
edit: I was mildly retarded when I wrote this, but actually managed to stay somewhat coherent. What a pleasant surprise.
edit: I was mildly retarded when I wrote this, but actually managed to stay somewhat coherent. What a pleasant surprise.
Re: Future features
You are two men, doing love together... Isn't it enough already?rude wrote:We kind of are ... although I refuse to accept "partner"; it somehow has a homosexual ring to it. ^.^alxs wrote: Oh, I thought you were both equal "partners" here
I'll avoid comments on this onerude wrote:True ... collision detection is possible to do in Lua, whereas the file handling must be done natively. (Actually, the io library in Lua might be available, but it will soon be made unavailable).
Anyway, why did this thread get lost? It'd be nice discussing about feature suggestion instead of simply suggesting them via issue tracker
lf = love.filesystem
ls = love.sound
la = love.audio
lp = love.physics
lt = love.thread
li = love.image
lg = love.graphics
ls = love.sound
la = love.audio
lp = love.physics
lt = love.thread
li = love.image
lg = love.graphics
Re: Future features
I think it's because it's about 4 years old. I'd like a *new* thread for discussing about feature suggestions too.Nixola wrote: Anyway, why did this thread get lost?
"Docendo discimus" - Lucius Annaeus Seneca
- bartbes
- Sex machine
- Posts: 4946
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:35 am
- Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Future features
You can make one, but for suggestions you're on the wrong place on the forums, there's an issue tracker for this!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 7 guests