Snayke - Out now! Version 1.1, soundtrack available

Show off your games, demos and other (playable) creations.
User avatar
StoneCrow
Party member
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 9:31 am
Location: Wales the land of leeks and leaks
Contact:

Re: Snayke [2.2]

Post by StoneCrow »

what are your future plans for this,
commercial, free, opensource?
Dull but sincere filler.
User avatar
slime
Solid Snayke
Posts: 3181
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:45 am
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Contact:

Re: Snayke [2.2]

Post by slime »

Free and open source, not that the source is particularly interesting or pretty. :P
User avatar
bartbes
Sex machine
Posts: 4946
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:35 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Snayke [2.2]

Post by bartbes »

Isn't it obvious? It's not his GPU, it's the fact he runs it in a VM..
coffee
Party member
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:07 pm

Re: Snayke [2.2]

Post by coffee »

slime wrote:What kind of computer/video card do you have coffee? Very few these days don't support framebuffers/canvases at all.
I doubt it's videocard or machine fault. it's a 3 year old imac DuoCore with a enough 256MB Nvidia videocard, should be enough right? But remember that I was running a Virtual Machine (Fusion) but even that have 3d acceleration with DX9c support, shaders and all that stuff. When my fat ass got tired of be sit here I will test it in Win7/Geforce videocard too (i'm soo lazy, it's in another room). Somewhere it should it run.
coffee
Party member
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:07 pm

Re: Snayke [2.2]

Post by coffee »

bartbes wrote:Isn't it obvious? It's not his GPU, it's the fact he runs it in a VM..
It could be a VM, but do I really need better than 3D Acceleration, DirectX9c, shaders, etc for framebuffers? I managed to run quite some games there.
User avatar
Ellohir
Party member
Posts: 235
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 11:12 pm

Re: Snayke [2.2]

Post by Ellohir »

I have DX9c support installed, but I use a plain DX7 hardware card. Most things don't work. I'd like to DirectX to eat my CPU and let me see nice laggy things, but that doesn't seem to be possible. So ultimately it's not what DX you support but your GPU capabilities, and I don't know how much of that can a VM get.
User avatar
bartbes
Sex machine
Posts: 4946
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:35 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Snayke [2.2]

Post by bartbes »

DirectX, thankfully, has nothing to do with love. Ever. EVER.
OpenGL is what matters, and sadly, it's something a lot of (VM-making) people overlook.

Disclaimer: I am not talking about the future
User avatar
slime
Solid Snayke
Posts: 3181
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:45 am
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Contact:

Re: Snayke [2.2]

Post by slime »

bartbes wrote:DirectX, thankfully, has nothing to do with love. Ever. EVER.
Quoted in case you edit! <.< >.>

even though you can edit this post too
User avatar
bartbes
Sex machine
Posts: 4946
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:35 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Snayke [2.2]

Post by bartbes »

But you forgot to quote my disclaimer!
coffee
Party member
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:07 pm

Re: Snayke [2.2]

Post by coffee »

bartbes wrote:DirectX, thankfully, has nothing to do with love. Ever. EVER.
OpenGL is what matters, and sadly, it's something a lot of (VM-making) people overlook.

Disclaimer: I am not talking about the future
Well sorry for that Bartbes, GFX/hardware coding issues aren't my strong (well I'm really mediocre on that) and you have of course right on that. However that made me now do the homework well. I use Fusion 3 and according wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VMware_Fusion

Code: Select all

Support for DirectX 9.0c with Shader Model 3 and OpenGL graphics libraries ( v2.1 in XPDM drivers, v1.4 in WDDM drivers )
Don't know if is enough for Love 0.8 but since a lot of indie games that I occasionally test and play use openGL I guess Fusion OpenGL support can't be so bad.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests