Page 6 of 10
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:15 pm
by TsT
I made the test. on Linux over (more 5 years dell laptop) with nVidia Corporation NV34M [GeForce FX Go5200 64M]
Result: Non-Po2 Images
I'm not supporting Framebuffers and the test still loop in state 4, never pass to state 5.
I suggest to change the test code from :
Code: Select all
elseif state == 4 then
if not supports.fb then return end
to
Code: Select all
elseif state == 4 then
if not supports.fb then state = 5 ; return end
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:22 am
by Piggles
Lenovo Ideapad laptop running Ubuntu 11.04 (i3 380M cpu, GeForce 310M graphics)
Code: Select all
Framebuffers
Non-PO2 framebuffers
Non-PO2 images
Framebuffers up to 16384 x 16384
Power of 3 frambuffers up to 19683 x 19683
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:44 pm
by adrix89
I don't think pcall works in this test
It said that I support everything when I'm actually not supporting npot framebuffers
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 1:17 am
by Ertain
If anyone's interested, I'm using a Toshiba Satellite laptop with 3 gigs of RAM, a 2 gig AMD Turion 2X processor, an ATI Mobility 1250 graphics card, and PCLinuxOS with Xorg version 7.3.1 and Direct Rendering on.
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 4:08 am
by benloran
Machine: MacBook Pro 3,1 with OSX 10.6.8
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo 2.2GHz
Memory: 2 GB DDR2
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT 128 MB
I had the same problem as other OSX users here, with the max framebuffer size test crashing (it prints Bus Error in the console). However, if I modify the po2 loop to only go up to 11, it works (12 and it crashes). The results with it set to 1,11:
Framebuffers
Non-Po2 Framebuffers
Non-Po2 Images
Framebuffers up to the size 4096 x 4096 (this is the modified loop)
Power of 3 Framebuffers up to the size 6561 x 6561
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:52 am
by Kadoba
Framebuffers / Non-Po2 Framebuffers and images
32 bit Windows Vista
Pentium Core 2 Quad x 2.4Ghz
3GB DDR 2
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
framebuffers up to 16384 x 16384
3 framebuffers up to 6561 x 6561
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:56 am
by T-Bone
Framebuffers
Non PO2 framebuffers
Non PO2 images
Framebuffers sizes up to 4096*4096
Power of 3 framebuffers up to 2187*2187
My computer is a EeePC with an Intel Atom N270 @ 1,6GHz running Ubuntu 11.04. Does not support SpriteBatches at all, though.
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 11:04 am
by BlackBulletIV
Thanks for all the results guys.
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:46 am
by cattail
My old PC , celeron 1.7G NV Geforce2 MX400
support frambuffers,
Non-Frambuffers,
Non-Po2 images,
FB 8192x8192
Power 3 FB 6561x6561
This test prog is great, I can't know If I would use FB , now I 1st demo (Sokuban like is only 3 FPS)
thank a lot.
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 12:15 pm
by Nixola
PC: Packard Bell KAV60
CPU: Intel Atom N280 @ 1.66GHz
Display Adapter (I've got only this, related to graphics, in the Device Manager): Mobile Intel 945 Express Chipset Family
Memory: 1GB @ Don'tKnow
OS: Windows XP
I support: Non-Po2 images