Alternative tile implementation

BlackBulletIV · Post by **BlackBulletIV** » Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:17 am

I would recommend first trying a tiny framebuffer of 2x2 to really see if framebuffers aren't supported. Computers have limits as to how large they can be.

T-Bone · Post by **T-Bone** » Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:21 am

BlackBulletIV wrote:I would recommend first trying a tiny framebuffer of 2x2 to really see if framebuffers aren't supported. Computers have limits as to how large they can be.

True. The ones I use in my example here are 512*512 (PO2) and 320*240 (non-PO2).

Post by **slime** » Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:02 pm

appleide wrote:I have a macbook pro (2009) and it does not support framebuffers.

My mom's old macbook with an integrated Intel card supports large power-of-two framebuffers just fine. Make sure it's not a PO2 issue, as stated above...

Jasoco · Post by **Jasoco** » Sun Jul 10, 2011 1:41 am

Why not run that test program someone created a few months ago that would test your system and tell you what you can't do?

BlackBulletIV · Post by **BlackBulletIV** » Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:28 am

I think you're referring to this test. Be warned, it does have a few problems with it that I never got round to fixing, but I think it still does the job pretty well.

T-Bone · Post by **T-Bone** » Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:57 am

Hey, nice test.

BlackBulletIV · Post by **BlackBulletIV** » Sun Jul 10, 2011 11:04 am

Thanks.

Alternative tile implementation

Re: Alternative tile implementation

Re: Alternative tile implementation

Re: Alternative tile implementation

Re: Alternative tile implementation

Re: Alternative tile implementation

Re: Alternative tile implementation

Re: Alternative tile implementation

Who is online