LÖVE

Also: w0000000t!!!

! WARNING !
-----------
This software is not complete. This is just a preview. Don't expect to find any
interface consistencies between releases at all. With each release, everything
you once knew and loved may be brutally murdered. By which I mean removed and/or
changed.

Now I understand why not working.
I'd rather wait for "LÖVE 0.7.0" a stable version.

com_1 wrote:

! WARNING !
-----------
This software is not complete. This is just a preview. Don't expect to find any
interface consistencies between releases at all. With each release, everything
you once knew and loved may be brutally murdered. By which I mean removed and/or
changed.

Now I understand why not working.
I'd rather wait for "LÖVE 0.7.0" a stable version.

0.7.0 is stable. There's just no guaranteed API stability between versions. Meaning games written for 0.7.0 may not run in 0.8.0.

0.7.0 is just as stable (hopefully more stable) than 0.6.2, what it means is that we haven't reached 1.0.0 yet.

Good day, fellow lovers

0.7.0 crashes on my computer and won't crash on anything else. At first, I thought it might be some msvcr80.dll nonsense or some fancy framebuffer thing, but Dependency Walker showed me this:

Second chance exception 0xC000001D (Illegal Instruction) occurred in "LOVE.EXE" at address 0x004401C1.

I guess it means that my processor is too old-school for new version of Love or compiler used for this build. Is there any way to make it more retro-friendly?

Since you seem to be convinced it's your cpu, what cpu do you use?

Endeg wrote:Good day, fellow lovers

0.7.0 crashes on my computer and won't crash on anything else. At first, I thought it might be some msvcr80.dll nonsense or some fancy framebuffer thing, but Dependency Walker showed me this:

Second chance exception 0xC000001D (Illegal Instruction) occurred in "LOVE.EXE" at address 0x004401C1.

I guess it means that my processor is too old-school for new version of Love or compiler used for this build. Is there any way to make it more retro-friendly?

Aw man, deep down i knew SSE2 was a bad idea. I can try recompiling without that for you.

What CPU do you have?

bartbes wrote:Since you seem to be convinced it's your cpu, what cpu do you use?

TechnoCat wrote: Aw man, deep down i knew SSE2 was a bad idea. I can try recompiling without that for you.

What CPU do you have?

It's Athlon XP, and yes, it doesn't support sse2.
The recompiling would be just great .

Endeg wrote:It's Athlon XP, and yes, it doesn't support sse2.
The recompiling would be just great .

Here is an SSE build for Windows. The purpose of this is to support old CPU's.

It's working! Thanks