Re: ranking
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:27 pm
No, that would be on IRC.jjmafiae wrote:cookie clicker clones?
Not on #love, not even on OFTC
Not on #love, not even on OFTC
Page 2 of 2
Not on #love, not even on OFTC
Re: ranking
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:05 pm
you just want the cookie clicker clones for yourself, xD
Re: ranking
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 1:47 pm
jjmafiae wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:12 pm what i encountered:
start title: prole ( 0 posts )
second title: citizen (80 posts)
third title: party member (100)
--not sure about last one
fourth title: inner party member (1000)
I don't think that is true - cause I have seen inner party members under 1000 posts and many citizens under 50 posts. I guess rude is behind all this or maybe the other team members. Or maybe it's something else that counts maybe the rate at which you post.Davidobot wrote:a hidden sub-forum.
Re: ranking
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:33 pm
Can you stop bumping ancient threads with zero reason or additions to the topics? Chances are, no one is going to care. 
Re: ranking
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 6:18 pm
Well I'm sorry it was no-where written that this thread was an "ancient thread" neither did any-one inform me that I couldn't reply to "ancient threads". And I'm pretty sure this is not the first time we are meeting, right z.org
Re: ranking
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 7:33 pm
No worries, people make mistakes, the dates are indeed very small.
Also, you can reply, it's just usually pointless unless one's contributing something worthwhile, hence why some are against it, even if it's technically not a rule; it does bump off more recent topics that people are interested in, from the first page of any subforum.
- gregorian_date_system.png (16.56 KiB) Viewed 3535 times
Re: ranking
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 8:03 pm
Well that is some logical reason which I didn't expect from you! If you'd always be so logical then I guess we will never have any clashes (you can bet on it)zorg wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 7:33 pm Also, you can reply, it's just usually pointless unless one's contributing something worthwhile, hence why some are against it, even if it's technically not a rule; it does bump off more recent topics that people are interested in, from the first page of any subforum.
And you said "people make mistakes" but I don't think you quite agree with that yourselves. Otherwise you woudn't have taken 'negative stance' against me.