LÖVE

Since every instance of table.insert I could find here inserted at the end, this is not a problem for StoneCrow.

Robin wrote:Since every instance of table.insert I could find here inserted at the end, this is not a problem for StoneCrow.

So basically just using table.insert without an index is equivalent to table[#table+1] = ..., right?

Yeah, and I think it has similar performance. At least close enough to not bother choosing one over the other for optimisation purposes until and unless you discover it's a bottleneck for your game.

Thanks I will keep that in mind!
Hadn't thought of it that way before.