Page 2 of 2

Re: lodex: a shmup

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:58 am
by cag
Robin wrote:Looks interesting. It's a bit CPU-intensive for my machine.
haha, box2d simulation of things is pretty tough.

yeah, so wondering if I should nix the physics system and write a simplified game physics handler.
Robin wrote:It might work as .love if you change all those require "yale/util" etc. to require "yale.util".
everything was "*.*" before I changed it to "*/*" in an attempt to fix things. :/

Re: lodex: a shmup

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:44 am
by kikito
In PÄSSION, I had to put the complete file path (including extension) and used /:

Code: Select all

require "my/file/path.lua"

Re: lodex: a shmup

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:48 am
by Robin
I believe this was a bug in LÖVE. When was it fixed..? Can't remember.

cag, what version of LÖVE are you using?

Re: lodex: a shmup

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:34 am
by bartbes
No, no, no, if you guys would've just checked the file.. the problem is that there are both the yale dir and yale.lua.

Re: lodex: a shmup

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:52 am
by Robin
bartbes wrote:No, no, no, if you guys would've just checked the file.. the problem is that there are both the yale dir and yale.lua.
I skipped the file and just read the comments.

Re: lodex: a shmup

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:52 am
by cag
bartbes wrote:No, no, no, if you guys would've just checked the file.. the problem is that there are both the yale dir and yale.lua.
Thanks man, that was it. I used that as a way to make possible something like require "yale", since the init.lua in folder method was broken. That was before I decided to go totally modular, so I guess I just forgot about the file.

Here is a fix'd version for now. I reverted stuff back to the old requiring and took out yale.lua.

Re: lodex: a shmup

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 3:39 am
by pygy
cag wrote:Hoorah.
I'll second that, it's sweet, swift and smooth ^^; neat, nifty and ... nooth? :crazy:
cag wrote:The code is somewhat messy but WTFPL, ...
Feel free to switch to its Romantic cousin (see my signature). I'm actively recruting users ATM! :nyu:

Re: lodex: a shmup

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:43 pm
by Luiji
The Romantic Public License looks cool, but it would be nice to have a plainer version of it (called the Easily Readable WTF License).

Re: lodex: a shmup

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:08 pm
by Robin
Luiji wrote:The Romantic Public License looks cool, but it would be nice to have a plainer version of it (called the Easily Readable WTF License).
Seriously, why not just use CC0?