LÖVE

Posted: **Fri Jan 29, 2010 12:25 pm**

Luac exists as a specific solution for specific problems, by and large you shouldn't ever have to actually use it, and doing so is advised against, as it negates several of Lua's advantages (both in the toolchain, and at runtime) for very little gain.

Posted: **Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:23 pm**

Back to the topic, I'm currently working on Unicode support, patterns and multiple assignments.

Here's an example :

Code: Select all

Polygamy.keyboard.add("calculator", {
	[ { "+", "-", "*" "/", ".", "return", "c" "%d" } ] = function(k) calculator.send(k) end
})

And a basic Xwing clone could see it's input written like this:

Code: Select all

Polygamy.keyboard.add("X-Wing",{
	[ "[1-4]" ] = function(s) spaceShip.setSpeed(s+0) end,
	[ "[5-8]" ] = function(w) spaceShip.setWeapon(w-4) end,
	
	[ { [[ %arrows ]], "[WASD]"} ] = { held = function(k,dt) spaceShip.move(k,dt) end },
	
	[" "] = {
		pressed = spaceship.shoot,
		held = function(k,dt) spaceShip.accumulateEnergy(dt) end,
		released = spaceShip.unleashBigBlow
	},
	
	b = spaceShip.launchBomb
	
	escape = game.quit
})

I'm also thinking of adding a new constants: Polygamy.before that will catch all keys before it's sent down the road. Good for logging.

Polygamy.keybaord is actually becoming a keyboard definition DSL. I like that.
Now it's time to debug.
Next up: serialization to allow the possibility of saving the configuration.

Posted: **Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:27 pm**

If you use pattern matching, I don't think the calculator example will work. I think you should change it to this:

Code: Select all

    Polygamy.keyboard.add("calculator", {
       [ { "\+", "\-", "\*" "/", "\.", "return", "c" "%d"}] = function(k) calculator.send(k) end
    })

Posted: **Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:35 pm**

No, I'm using custom patterns, with a hand made parser. Their syntax is based on the standard Lua one, but it's more limited and more capable at the same time. Currently %a, %d, %w, %arrows, [0-9], [a-z] and [whatever,one_key-at/a.time!including+restricted*characters] are supported, but with only one pattern per string.

The point is to make the common case easy, and to keep the code readable.

Posted: **Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:42 pm**

Oh, that's awesome.

Would that mean that one would be able to represent the example code as:

Code: Select all

    Polygamy.keyboard.add("calculator", {
       [ { "[+-*return.c/]", "%d"}] = function(k) calculator.send(k) end
    })

?

(btw, I made a mistake earlier: in Lua, special characters in patterns are escaped with %, not \. I apologize to anyone I might have offended. Such as bartbes.)

Posted: **Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:49 pm**

You could do

Code: Select all

[ { "[+-*.c/]", "return", "%d" } ] = calculator.send

Your example would blindly assign the r, e, t, u, r, and n keys to the same function.

Posted: **Fri Jan 29, 2010 6:15 pm**

pygy wrote:Your example would blindly assign the r, e, t, u, r, and n keys to the same function.

Woops

Posted: **Fri Jan 29, 2010 6:38 pm**

I've only skimmed through all of these posts, But from what i see this seems helpful

The reason i posted is because i saw a reference to the Lost Vikings! I loved that game as a child! Required plenty of strategic skill and logic unlike all these next gen titles which are so linear and mindnumbing...

Keep up the good work

Posted: **Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:12 am**

Robin wrote:The whole point of Lua is that you don't have to compile it to make it work.

I know, i just find it nicer to have compiled libs but i'm not going to push the issue

This lib keeps getting better and better though, keep it up

Posted: **Wed Feb 03, 2010 6:53 pm**

v 0.3.1 is online (see first post) and it works !!

The most important new features is the keyboard-based patterns expansions (see below for examples). To make this more useful, the coordinates of each keys are now passed to the bound functions along the key string and unicode number if relevant. They only work properly on US qwerty keyboards, due to a current limitation of LÖVE itself. It can still be useful if you target the subset common to qwerty,qwertz and azerty (sorry, Dvorak users

)

Code: Select all

Polygamy.keyboard.add("function keys",{
	[ "[f1-f5]" ]=function(key,row,column,unicode) engine.throttle(column) end
}

v0.3.1 (2010/02/03)

First working version published .
[q-r] => {q, w, e, r} (horizontal). -- [x-5] => {x, d, r, 5} (diagonal) -- [6-h] => {6, y, h} (vertical) -- [f1-f10] => {f1, f2, ... , f10} -- Assumes an US qwerty keyboard at the moment.
Simplified the callbacks a bit.
Don't use doto().replaceWith() at the moment (there's a known bug regarding inheritance preservation).

v0.3 (2010/02/02)

/!\ Still not tested (and completely broken)
TypeMatic (key repeat).
Unicode.
Track the active context (to reset options).
Reset options on doto actions.
Pattern matching.
pass key coordinates to all callbacks.
"Before" blocks.
Extensive code documentation.

[/size]

Some corner cases may still be problematic, of course, but it should be usable as is for most purposes.

Have fun

LÖVE

Pölygamy: a collection of LÖVE helper libraries

Re: Pölygamy: a collection of LÖVE helper libraries

Re: Pölygamy: a collection of LÖVE helper libraries

Re: Pölygamy: a collection of LÖVE helper libraries

Re: Pölygamy: a collection of LÖVE helper libraries

Re: Pölygamy: a collection of LÖVE helper libraries

Re: Pölygamy: a collection of LÖVE helper libraries

Re: Pölygamy: a collection of LÖVE helper libraries

Re: Pölygamy: a collection of LÖVE helper libraries

Re: Pölygamy: a collection of LÖVE helper libraries

Re: Pölygamy: a collection of LÖVE helper libraries