A Question of Draw performance
Forum rules
Before you make a thread asking for help, read this.
Before you make a thread asking for help, read this.
Re: A Question of Draw performance
I implemented this multi dimensional array, its now much cleaner than before but the next consideration is how to check for when to update the screen. My next idea is to only update the screen when the camera x or y has moved more than 16 px, rather than now which is obviously a big tug on the resources. Ill post back if I get further luck. Some point in the next few weeks when this is working well and much cleaner ill put the complete source on github or something.
Just need more time on it first.
Just need more time on it first.
Sagan Interactive - Looking forward to a creative 2013.
- Roland_Yonaba
- Inner party member
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 6:08 pm
- Location: Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso)
- Contact:
Re: A Question of Draw performance
Hm.. Why not implement it as a conditional statement in love.update ?Pash wrote:I implemented this multi dimensional array, its now much cleaner than before but the next consideration is how to check for when to update the screen. My next idea is to only update the screen when the camera x or y has moved more than 16 px, rather than now which is obviously a big tug on the resources. Ill post back if I get further luck. Some point in the next few weeks when this is working well and much cleaner ill put the complete source on github or something.
Just need more time on it first.
Well, check for the displacement made so far, and if it gets more than the desired value, call the relevant update method, passing it dt, and then reset the displacement counter to zero again....
Unless I totally missed what the intent was.
Re: A Question of Draw performance
Hey Roland,
Yeh, this is kind of my idea. The below doesnt seem to work.
This doesnt seem to work at all.
Its still a bit messy I know. But this is where im at. Im guessing there is a better way of doing this....Attached the love file.
Yeh, this is kind of my idea. The below doesnt seem to work.
Code: Select all
function camera:follow(target)
local oldcamx = self.x
if target.x + target.width/2 > love.graphics.getWidth() / 2 then
self.x = math.floor(target.x + target.width/2 - love.graphics.getWidth() / 2)
else
self.x = 0
end
if target.y < love.graphics.getHeight() / 2 then
self.y = math.floor(target.y - love.graphics.getHeight() / 2)
else
self.y = 0
end
if self.x - oldcamx > 2 then
GameWorld:updateSpriteBatch()
end
end
Code: Select all
unction world:updateSpriteBatch()
local xdmin,xdmax = self:CheckBlockXMinMax()
local ydmin,ydmax = self:CheckBlockYMinMax()
blockSetBatch:bind()
blockSetBatch:clear()
for i=ydmin,ydmax do
for j=xdmin,xdmax do
if WorldBlocks[i][j].idno ~= 0 then
blockSetBatch:addq( WorldBlocks[i][j].id.img, j * self.blockSize - self.blockSize, i * self.blockSize - self.blockSize )
end
end
end
blockSetBatch:unbind()
end
Its still a bit messy I know. But this is where im at. Im guessing there is a better way of doing this....Attached the love file.
- Attachments
-
- tbad.love
- (7.36 KiB) Downloaded 83 times
Sagan Interactive - Looking forward to a creative 2013.
Re: A Question of Draw performance
Excuse me. Im being stupidly silly. I see why that wouldnt work. I think my update sprite method is ok though, seems to draw whats visible on the screen.
Ok, ill try and fix that tonight then.
Ok, ill try and fix that tonight then.
Sagan Interactive - Looking forward to a creative 2013.
Re: A Question of Draw performance
It is not enough to check if the x-difference between the current frame and the last frame is greater than 2. It might happen, that you move one pixel per frame, for many frames. Then after some time you need new tiles, but your codes believes everything is ok. The correct solution is as follows:
In each timestep you calculate the tile-coordinates (that is i and j) of the top left corner. This is done with the math.floor-function:
Now in each timestep you compare screeni and screeny of the last time step with the current values. If there is a change, then the spritebatch needs to be updated, if not, not.
And one short comment to your spritebatch update: It looks like you store empty tiles as 0 ("zero"). Instead of that I suggest you store them as nil. That way, this part of the memory is not even existing and you need less memory. However you then have to take care of nonexisting variables:
If you have a "nil" in an if-condition, it is consideres as "false"
In each timestep you calculate the tile-coordinates (that is i and j) of the top left corner. This is done with the math.floor-function:
Code: Select all
screeni = math.floor(camera.x/tileWidth)
screenj = math.floor(camera.y/tileHeight)
And one short comment to your spritebatch update: It looks like you store empty tiles as 0 ("zero"). Instead of that I suggest you store them as nil. That way, this part of the memory is not even existing and you need less memory. However you then have to take care of nonexisting variables:
Code: Select all
for i=ydmin,ydmax do
if WoldBlocks[i] then
for j=xdmin,xdmax do
if WorldBlocks[i][j] then
blockSetBatch:addq( ... )
end
end
end
end
Check out my blog on gamedev
Re: A Question of Draw performance
Thanks micha. Yeh that looks much better. My idea was to start moving the draw code over to the camera anyway. I dont really need to draw the world from that class blueprint - as the camera is the v in mvc (if I look at it like that). I thought of something like this in the camera update:-micha wrote:It is not enough to check if the x-difference between the current frame and the last frame is greater than 2. It might happen, that you move one pixel per frame, for many frames. Then after some time you need new tiles, but your codes believes everything is ok. The correct solution is as follows:
In each timestep you calculate the tile-coordinates (that is i and j) of the top left corner. This is done with the math.floor-function:Now in each timestep you compare screeni and screeny of the last time step with the current values. If there is a change, then the spritebatch needs to be updated, if not, not.Code: Select all
screeni = math.floor(camera.x/tileWidth) screenj = math.floor(camera.y/tileHeight)
And one short comment to your spritebatch update: It looks like you store empty tiles as 0 ("zero"). Instead of that I suggest you store them as nil. That way, this part of the memory is not even existing and you need less memory. However you then have to take care of nonexisting variables:If you have a "nil" in an if-condition, it is consideres as "false"Code: Select all
for i=ydmin,ydmax do if WoldBlocks[i] then for j=xdmin,xdmax do if WorldBlocks[i][j] then blockSetBatch:addq( ... ) end end end end
Code: Select all
if self.x - self.displacementX > blockSize or self.x - self.displacementX < -blockSize then
self.displacementX = self.x
updateSpriteBatch()
end
To be fair, I did have that worldblocks is "nil or exists" check previously but I had some issues with it. I cant remember what now, but ill revisit it and try again.
Sagan Interactive - Looking forward to a creative 2013.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests