My bat just simply demonstrated, you could compile and test it yourself if you wanted to.
No decompiler can decompile it, afaik.
How to Protect a Resulting .Exe?
Forum rules
Before you make a thread asking for help, read this.
Before you make a thread asking for help, read this.
Re: How to Protect a Resulting .Exe?
Lua is not an acronym.
Re: How to Protect a Resulting .Exe?
Well I just went made a trip to XP...qaisjp wrote:My bat just simply demonstrated, you could compile and test it yourself if you wanted to.
No decompiler can decompile it, afaik.
afaik you failed. can be done with another parameters: qaisjp I never done much compiling. I actually don't know much about it. Made some experiences for fun and that was probably the second or third time I mess with luac/luadec. No experience at all at this but don't expect much protection to decompilation in Lua work. There is always a way...
- Attachments
-
- luac.lua
- The luac file used. (.out was not allowed here)
- (513 Bytes) Downloaded 85 times
Re: How to Protect a Resulting .Exe?
I should've mentioned that it also depends on the size of the file, something that small can be decompiled with that method. Try this file, which is quite large (as compared to the other one):coffee wrote:Well I just went made a trip to XP...qaisjp wrote:My bat just simply demonstrated, you could compile and test it yourself if you wanted to.
No decompiler can decompile it, afaik.
afaik you failed. can be done with another parameters: qaisjp I never done much compiling. I actually don't know much about it. Made some experiences for fun and that was probably the second or third time I mess with luac/luadec. No experience at all at this but don't expect much protection to decompilation in Lua work. There is always a way...
Lua is not an acronym.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], plexity and 3 guests