Here's a tiny, unambitious game I just made. The controls are WASD or arrow keys. Download it here. I use two Trash80 songs in it, so major credit goes to him.
Chromatic Paths
- Taehl
- Dreaming in associative arrays
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:07 am
- Location: CA, USA
- Contact:
Chromatic Paths
Earliest Love2D supporter who can't Love anymore. Let me disable pixel shaders if I don't use them, dammit!
Lenovo Thinkpad X60 Tablet, built like a tank. But not fancy enough for Love2D 0.10.0+.
Lenovo Thinkpad X60 Tablet, built like a tank. But not fancy enough for Love2D 0.10.0+.
Re: Chromatic Paths
You're supposed to collect the dots by the way, I wasn't really sure what I was doing until I asked.
- josefnpat
- Inner party member
- Posts: 955
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 1:36 am
- Location: your basement
- Contact:
Re: Chromatic Paths
Oh god, when the colors change to darkness, I find myself cursing out loud.
Keep the darkness out of it, it's really annoying.
Edit:
Keep the darkness out of it, it's really annoying.
Edit:
Thanks for making it!Victory! Thank you for playing:
Missing Sentinel Software | Twitter
FORCIBLY IGNORED.
<leafo> when in doubt delete all of your code
<bartbes> git rm -r *
<bartbes> git commit -m "Fixed all bugs"
<bartbes> git push
FORCIBLY IGNORED.
<leafo> when in doubt delete all of your code
<bartbes> git rm -r *
<bartbes> git commit -m "Fixed all bugs"
<bartbes> git push
Re: Chromatic Paths
You sometimes get trapped with no way to reset as far as I know. Like this:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7572962/Sk%C3%A ... 0Paths.png
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7572962/Sk%C3%A ... 0Paths.png
My game called Hat Cat and the Obvious Crimes Against the Fundamental Laws of Physics is out now!
-
- Prole
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 3:13 pm
Re: Chromatic Paths
For clarity, I would not remove the base of triangles that in opposite directions. It makes it look like there is something special about those triangles when there isn't. All triangles should have a base.
- Taehl
- Dreaming in associative arrays
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:07 am
- Location: CA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Chromatic Paths
Yeah, that's a game over. I couldn't think of a decent way off the top of my head to check for situations like that.T-Bone wrote:You sometimes get trapped with no way to reset as far as I know.
Technically speaking, /none/ of the triangles have bases. They used to, but it didn't look as good - this way breaks up the grid a bit, which is easier on the eyes.pancakepalace wrote:For clarity, I would not remove the base of triangles that in opposite directions. It makes it look like there is something special about those triangles when there isn't. All triangles should have a base.
Earliest Love2D supporter who can't Love anymore. Let me disable pixel shaders if I don't use them, dammit!
Lenovo Thinkpad X60 Tablet, built like a tank. But not fancy enough for Love2D 0.10.0+.
Lenovo Thinkpad X60 Tablet, built like a tank. But not fancy enough for Love2D 0.10.0+.
- Robin
- The Omniscient
- Posts: 6506
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:29 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Chromatic Paths
It is still really confusing, though.Taehl wrote:Technically speaking, /none/ of the triangles have bases. They used to, but it didn't look as good - this way breaks up the grid a bit, which is easier on the eyes.
Help us help you: attach a .love.
- kikito
- Inner party member
- Posts: 3153
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:22 pm
- Location: Madrid, Spain
- Contact:
Re: Chromatic Paths
I liked it. Although black should be kept out of the color pallete swap, as josefnpat said.
When I write def I mean function.
Re: Chromatic Paths
Nice idea, maybe a bit simple . But its fun
-
- Prole
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 3:13 pm
Re: Chromatic Paths
It's not important for the user what is happening on a technical level, what matters is what he sees.Taehl wrote:Technically speaking, /none/ of the triangles have bases. They used to, but it didn't look as good - this way breaks up the grid a bit, which is easier on the eyes.
I understand your point of view of trying to break up the grid and make it less busy by not displaying the bases of opposing triangles. I'm sure it does make it easier on the eyes. The problem is that this is a puzzle game, and introducing an element that breaks the standard for a reason that is not linked to the puzzle leads to confusion. Our eyes see these diamond shapes and we believe it might have to do with the puzzle aspect of the game. After playing a bit, and realizing what's going on, it's a major bummer to come to understand that the diamonds mean nothing. It doesn't seem pure. I find the best puzzle games are those that don't distract with confused elements. When it's all pure, it makes it that much more satisfying when we figure out what's happening.
One solution would be to remove all the bases. This would set a standard, and make the grid less busy all at once. However, what I would do is make the triangles much smaller. And I would only highlight the triangles in red when they block the way, instead of making the whole square turn red. This would provide a clearer clue to the player as to what is going on as the triangles would be in better focus.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 1 guest