LÖVE needs a wiki and a ticket system

[qubodup]

So I took a look at some of the ticket system used by some open source games (or non-games, when I couldn't find a game that used them). I link to each "submit new issue" form, as I think that it's the most important thing to look at. When login is required to access the ticket submit form, I link to a screenshot of it.

• Bugzilla: Firefox
• Gna!: Wesnoth
• Google Code: Radakan
• Mantis: Mantis
• phpBB: Wesnoth
• SourceForge.net: Vega Strike
• Trac: Warzone 2100

Notice the wide span between Bugzilla and Google Code.

See all screenshots in this set.

Please don't take these examples too serious, I'm sure the ammount of fields in many of these examples is not always the default set and can be configured.

For me, the main thing is that it's easy for the bug reporter to provide the info, without having to know what a branch or milestone is. Also I think that instead of "version: DROPDOWNMENU" it should be "What version is your copy of LOVE? DROPDOWNMENU".

I think the following is important to ask from the user:

• Operating system
• LÖVE version
• Description

Having a default text like the one in Google Code might be a good idea.

What would you consider a good ticket-submitting dialog?

My vote ATM is for Trac regarding tracker and MediaWiki regarding wiki (although Trac would be fine too IMHO).

[rude]

http://love2d.org/wiki

Qubodup, you need to log once in so I can Sysop your ass.

I've also looked at Trac, but it has too many dependencies and requires shell access to install. I would prefer something written in PHP and installable in a browser. Maybe we'll create a small custom system.

[qubodup]

Qubodup, you need to log once in so I can Sysop your ass.

k, I did.

Maybe we'll create a small custom system.

Just so I don't forget later: the bug reports and replies to them must have emoticons in the sense of "my current mood" for fun effects.

Why is it not working?

Fix this crap!

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?

Oh thankyouthankyouthankyou...

It might be good if the icons did not have word descriptions, so that the emotion is directly connected to the image, instead of the word behind it. /me speculates

[1stAnd10]

The downside of Wiki's and game engines is that whenever a company or group puts up a wiki for their engine, they use the wiki as an excuse to not provide "official" documentation any longer.

To be an open source engine I think the LOVE documentation online is superb and is a HUGE reason why I decided to use it. Please don't stop doing that even with a wiki.

[mike]

The wiki will have more readable documentation with tutorials and such, but the reference manual isn't going away anytime soon. I find it VERY useful.

[rasjani]

My vote goes for Trac. It has git support too (no idea what you guys use) + its own wiki implementation.

[bartbes]

I added a page!
Seriously though, why isn't anyone using the wiki? This many requests and... nothing?!

[qubodup]

I added a page!
Seriously though, why isn't anyone using the wiki? This many requests and... nothing?!

We assume, that as long as it's not LOVEstyled, it could be purge-re-installed any day

[rude]

I may skin it (later), but it will not be purged, don't worry.

[qubodup]

In that case, please add - <a href="http://love2d.org/wiki">Wiki</a> to the top.

My reasoning: having the wiki one click far will result in editing it when they think "hey this might be a good thing to add to the wiki!" (otherwise the task of finding the wiki link or editing the url might change their mind "meh, not worth it!")