Test your computers "Framebuffer" and "PO2" support here...

Jasoco · Post by **Jasoco** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:44 am

Edit: Go here instead:
http://love2d.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2907

BarnD · Post by **BarnD** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:12 am

Lol, another one.

I support non-PO2 images, i just got an error for framebuffing cause its "Not supported by your OpenGL implementation"

Jasoco · Post by **Jasoco** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:16 am

BarnD wrote:Lol, another one.

I support non-PO2 images, i just got an error for framebuffing cause its "Not supported by your OpenGL implementation"

So it errors without making any? Yeah. I guess that means no FB for you. What are your specs? Oh wait, you posted them in the other thread. Wish I had known he posted that before I posted mine. We were working on our tests at the same time. lol

Wulfie · Post by **Wulfie** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:53 am

FB 12 2048x2048

Post by **bmelts** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:58 am

OH MY GOD YOU COMPUTER MURDERER

I make it up to 3 8192x8192 framebuffers before it dies.

Jasoco · Post by **Jasoco** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 5:25 am

anjo wrote:OH MY GOD YOU COMPUTER MURDERER

I make it up to 3 8192x8192 framebuffers before it dies.

Wow. I didn't even know anyone could support that. I wonder if it would even support a single 16348x16348 FB? LOL, who would even need that? I think 1024 should be the safer zone.

BarnD · Post by **BarnD** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:09 am

Jasoco wrote:So it errors without making any? Yeah. I guess that means no FB for you. What are your specs? Oh wait, you posted them in the other thread. Wish I had known he posted that before I posted mine. We were working on our tests at the same time. lol

to be precise

barnaby@desktop /tmp/FB+PO2 $ love ./main
Test is finished. The maximum Framebuffer limits are listed above.
This is the error:[string "main.lua"]:71: Cannot create Framebuffer: Not supported by your OpenGL implementation
Finished and quitting...

So yeah.. No FB for me.

Robin · Post by **Robin** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:46 am

Jasoco wrote:I wonder if it would even support a single 16348x16348 FB?

I bet not. 16348x16348 is four times the pixels of 8192x8192, and he could only make 3. I might be mistaken, I have no idea how the boundaries are defined.

BlackBulletIV · Post by **BlackBulletIV** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:53 am

To Jasoco: I've added the extra features in this one to my test. Should we redirect people to my test?

Jasoco · Post by **Jasoco** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:00 pm

Would be nice to just merge the threads if that's possible and just use whatever test works the best. I was only interested in the outcome. Namely the people who can't support this stuff.

Test your computers "Framebuffer" and "PO2" support here...

Test your computers "Framebuffer" and "PO2" support here...

Re: Test your computers "Framebuffer" and "PO2" support here

Re: Test your computers "Framebuffer" and "PO2" support here

Re: Test your computers "Framebuffer" and "PO2" support here

Re: Test your computers "Framebuffer" and "PO2" support here

Re: Test your computers "Framebuffer" and "PO2" support here

Re: Test your computers "Framebuffer" and "PO2" support here

Re: Test your computers "Framebuffer" and "PO2" support here

Re: Test your computers "Framebuffer" and "PO2" support here

Re: Test your computers "Framebuffer" and "PO2" support here

Who is online