No Comment

Showcase your libraries, tools and other projects that help your fellow love users.
User avatar
zac352
Party member
Posts: 496
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:13 pm
Location: In your head.
Contact:

Re: No Comment

Post by zac352 »

Jasoco wrote:I wrap at page width. I don't get the whole obsession with 80 characters. It's a relic from the DOS days when you needed to hard wrap a text file for it to appear right on screen.
I do it because I keep mah terminals at 80 characters. And because the right margin shows up more than half way across my screen, seeing as I have an extremely low resolution most of the time. :P
bartbes wrote:No more tabs vs spaces, because I know I am right. (though if I say what I prefer this will all start again)
It's gnawing away inside me to know what you prefer. :P
Hello, I am not dead.
User avatar
Robin
The Omniscient
Posts: 6506
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:29 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: No Comment

Post by Robin »

It's vertical tabs (0x0B), if you really want to know.
Help us help you: attach a .love.
User avatar
com_1
Prole
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 11:54 pm
Location: No Comment

Re: No Comment

Post by com_1 »

In my demo, I used only this - "love.timer.sleep(2);"

I wonder how this will work for you.
Who can accomplish your goal (post your comments) as you do with "FPS".

Image
Attachments
my project.love
(195.51 KiB) Downloaded 155 times
User avatar
Robin
The Omniscient
Posts: 6506
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:29 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: No Comment

Post by Robin »

I did see your game, and for me the walls work. You should try and fix it though, because if it doesn't work for some people there is probably still something wrong.

In addition to the sins other people have listed, you also put all your update code in love.draw. You have no love.update at all. (And that is terrible.)

Regarding the winning condition, am I correct in assuming the player actually has to pick up the balls/crystals/whatever in a certain order?
Help us help you: attach a .love.
User avatar
com_1
Prole
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 11:54 pm
Location: No Comment

Re: No Comment

Post by com_1 »

In this demo there is no end.

And as a function update, is not the solution.
I initially brought this demo using the function update.
But when come to the conclusion that without this function will be better.

On my laptop, this version (with sleep) works better than the first with function update.

Thanks for comments.
User avatar
tentus
Inner party member
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:56 pm
Location: Appalachia
Contact:

Re: No Comment

Post by tentus »

com_1 wrote:In this demo there is no end.

And as a function update, is not the solution.
I initially brought this demo using the function update.
But when come to the conclusion that without this function will be better.

On my laptop, this version (with sleep) works better than the first with function update.

Thanks for comments.
Wait, what? You think You're better off without update()?

That's like saying you're better off without tires on your car. It'll still slide along, sure, but you're gonna want that control and functionality later. How are you going to force things to be consistent without dt?
Kurosuke needs beta testers
User avatar
Robin
The Omniscient
Posts: 6506
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:29 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: No Comment

Post by Robin »

tentus wrote:That's like saying you're better off without tires on your car. It'll still slide along, sure, but you're gonna want that control and functionality later. How are you going to force things to be consistent without dt?
There's the love.timer.getDelta function, but conceptually, not using love.update is bad.
Help us help you: attach a .love.
User avatar
prototypez
Prole
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:17 pm

Re: No Comment

Post by prototypez »

bartbes wrote:No more tabs vs spaces, because I know I am right. (though if I say what I prefer this will all start again)
I use Microsoft Word 97 to write my code with word wrap off and convert all of my code to HTML. Then I compile it. It always works just fine! :death:
I love dashes... -- omnomnomnom oishii desu!
User avatar
tentus
Inner party member
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:56 pm
Location: Appalachia
Contact:

Re: No Comment

Post by tentus »

prototypez wrote:I use Microsoft Word 97 to write my code with word wrap off and convert all of my code to HTML. Then I compile it. It always works just fine! :death:
The very idea makes me bleed from my eyeballs.
Kurosuke needs beta testers
User avatar
BlackBulletIV
Inner party member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:19 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia
Contact:

Re: No Comment

Post by BlackBulletIV »

prototypez wrote:I use Microsoft Word 97 to write my code with word wrap off and convert all of my code to HTML. Then I compile it. It always works just fine! :death:
:o Even notepad would far, far better than Word!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 2 guests