fuzzy love
- ishkabible
- Party member
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:34 pm
- Location: Kansas USA
Re: fuzzy love
you could leave the conf.lua file be and have it specify the language. then main.nut or main.lua will be used depending on the language you choose. im not sure weather or not i will do this. my plans right now are just to take lua completely out of it and replace all functionality with Squirrel. so this way you have a conf.nut file and a main.nut.
- ishkabible
- Party member
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:34 pm
- Location: Kansas USA
Re: fuzzy love
ok so in trying to compile it i get this error.
i have looked for physfs.h but cant find it anywhere. where exactly is it?C:\Users\ishka\Desktop\GLUT\fuzzy_love\modules\filesystem\physfs\File.h|31|fatal error: physfs.h: No such file or directory|
- TechnoCat
- Inner party member
- Posts: 1611
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:31 am
- Location: Milwaukee, WI
- Contact:
Re: fuzzy love
You are proposing you choose between one or the other? Why can't they mix?
Re: fuzzy love
If performance is the goal, just use LuaJIT. It smokes nearly everything.ishkabible wrote:i made a radix sorting algorithm in lua and in Squirrel to see how much faster the Squirrel arrays where than lua and it was by orders of magnitude
Those are nice, to be sure.there are a number of other things like bit-wise operators, increment, deincrement that add to the power of the language.
- ishkabible
- Party member
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:34 pm
- Location: Kansas USA
Re: fuzzy love
how exactly would we mix them? you will have to chose one way or another witch language to choose so whats the best way to make the program figure out witch you are choosing?
still i cant find physys.h, where the hell is this thing?
still i cant find physys.h, where the hell is this thing?
- bartbes
- Sex machine
- Posts: 4946
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:35 am
- Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: fuzzy love
PhysicsFS is a separate library, it's not included in the repo, it shouldn't be.
- ishkabible
- Party member
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:34 pm
- Location: Kansas USA
Re: fuzzy love
ok didn't know that. now i can fix it
- ishkabible
- Party member
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:34 pm
- Location: Kansas USA
Re: fuzzy love
ok don't expect this any time soon. i have a number of other projects i'm working on and this one is a big one so it may take some time.
- kikito
- Inner party member
- Posts: 3153
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:22 pm
- Location: Madrid, Spain
- Contact:
Re: fuzzy love
I'm no mercurial expert, but it seems a subrepository might be just the right tool for that job.bartbes wrote:PhysicsFS is a separate library, it's not included in the repo, it shouldn't be.
When I write def I mean function.
Re: fuzzy love
I've already grown attached to this project, I should make sure it comes out. *downloads source code for 0.7.0*
Hello, I am not dead.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 3 guests