Thanks for picking up a code and for taking the time to play my game and give me feedback - I really appreciate this!
I'm aware of 'juiciness', in fact I saw a video on this last year. I hold my hands up: My game does not have juiciness! What it does have-- and you will discover this once you get to the end of world 2 and onwards --are really carefully thought-out puzzles, and a lot of new twists that the first world does not even hint at. Please give it a chance! It is rough around the edges but get into it and I assure you you will be rewarded.
On a less defensive note
, I completely take the point on the importance of presentation. While I don't think I will ever make this game 'juicy', I am working with a graphic designer to add new graphics, and I will be adding spot effects, also for onscreen buttons.Also one final point before I sign-off again: Slowness. From the first world there seems little point in the 'smooth' time-based motion in the game. A grid-based system might seem a more obvious and responsive choice. However there is a good reason for this. I don't want to drop spoilers, but once you get past world 1 (which is basically a tutorial world) it should become obvious why I've developed an 'engine' capable of handling 'dynamics'.
Cheers,
Andy
