Equivalent to Gamemaker's sign() function?
Forum rules
Before you make a thread asking for help, read this.
Before you make a thread asking for help, read this.
Equivalent to Gamemaker's sign() function?
There is a function in gamemaker studio that is quite useful but it doesn't seem to be the same as Math.sin evidently. It works like this:
"This function returns whether a number is positive, negative or neither and returns 1, -1, 0 respectively. For example - sign(458) will return 1, sign(-5) will return -1 and sign(0) will return 0."
Is there any way to do this with Lua?
"This function returns whether a number is positive, negative or neither and returns 1, -1, 0 respectively. For example - sign(458) will return 1, sign(-5) will return -1 and sign(0) will return 0."
Is there any way to do this with Lua?
Re: Equivalent to Gamemaker's sign() function?
Code: Select all
function sign(n)
return n < 0 and -1 or n > 0 and 1 or 0
end
Re: Equivalent to Gamemaker's sign() function?
Ok thanks. Just wondered if there was a set Math function in lua for that.
- zorg
- Party member
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:55 pm
- Location: Absurdistan, Hungary
- Contact:
Re: Equivalent to Gamemaker's sign() function?
There isn't; quite a few small math functions are missing from lua's math library.
Me and my stuff True Neutral Aspirant. Why, yes, i do indeed enjoy sarcastically correcting others when they make the most blatant of spelling mistakes. No bullying or trolling the innocent tho.
Re: Equivalent to Gamemaker's sign() function?
Worth noting that all languages that have it, implement sign funciton that way - there is no hardware CPU operation to which such function would map, so it has to be done in software anyway.
If your target CPU supports hardware min and max functions, and assuming that LuaJIT can leverage them, you can use the following branchless function:
I don't know if it's any good performance-wise, though you cache the math library data to upvalues and that'll improve something. In interpreted mode it probably wouldn't improve anything - the whole reason interpretation is slow is because there's a failed prediction of an execution branch at every single step of the way.
If your target CPU supports hardware min and max functions, and assuming that LuaJIT can leverage them, you can use the following branchless function:
Code: Select all
function sign ( val ) return math.max ( math.min ( val * math.huge, 1 ), -1 ) end
Re: Equivalent to Gamemaker's sign() function?
Since we're nitpicking I'll play too
I prefer this slight variant of grump's code:
It returns -1 for a negative number, 1 for a positive number, 0 for positive zero, -0 for negative zero, Not a Number for a NaN input and indeterminate for an indet input. I certainly prefer it to propagate NaNs/indets.
I prefer this slight variant of grump's code:
Code: Select all
function sign(n)
return n < 0 and -1 or n > 0 and 1 or n
end
Re: Equivalent to Gamemaker's sign() function?
I like grump's version best but I have to throw this one in:
Could be simplified if you are certain that n is non-zero:
Code: Select all
function sign(n)
return n == 0 and 0 or n/math.abs(n)
end
Code: Select all
assert(n ~= 0)
sign = n/math.abs(n)
Re: Equivalent to Gamemaker's sign() function?
Both * and / are quite costly for floating numbers, if LuaJIT can't help to optimize. A simple branching like grump's version could be more efficient.
The most efficient way to do this is probably by bitwise operations on the binary representation of floating number, if there's no CPU instruction for this. I don't know how this can be done in Lua though.
The most efficient way to do this is probably by bitwise operations on the binary representation of floating number, if there's no CPU instruction for this. I don't know how this can be done in Lua though.
-
- Prole
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:56 pm
Re: Equivalent to Gamemaker's sign() function?
I have no idea if this is how bitwise operations work in Lua, but given that all of the numbers are 64-bit doubles I imagine it would look something like:coffeecat wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:09 pm Both * and / are quite costly for floating numbers, if LuaJIT can't help to optimize. A simple branching like grump's version could be more efficient.
The most efficient way to do this is probably by bitwise operations on the binary representation of floating number, if there's no CPU instruction for this. I don't know how this can be done in Lua though.
Code: Select all
sign(n) = ((n & 0x8000000000000000 ~= 0) and -1) or 1
- zorg
- Party member
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:55 pm
- Location: Absurdistan, Hungary
- Contact:
Re: Equivalent to Gamemaker's sign() function?
There are no bitwise operations in lua (at least not in the version löve uses by default)... not using symbols that is, and luaJIT's bitop module functions return signed 32bit numbers; maybe something like the following may work, although ultimately i haven't tested it, and it doesn't have a separate retval for 0.Rubbermaid wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:06 pm I have no idea if this is how bitwise operations work in Lua, but given that all of the numbers are 64-bit doubles I imagine it would look something like:Code: Select all
sign(n) = ((n & 0x8000000000000000 ~= 0) and -1) or 1
Code: Select all
function sign(n) return bit.rshift(bit.band(n, bit.tobit(0x80000000)), 31) == 1 and -1 or 1 end
Me and my stuff True Neutral Aspirant. Why, yes, i do indeed enjoy sarcastically correcting others when they make the most blatant of spelling mistakes. No bullying or trolling the innocent tho.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 10 guests