Ah yes, I've listed the libraries with the latest repo version in mind, where DevIL is already ditched.
I agree that some libraries are better not linked statically, especially the ones that are closely tied to hardware/OS. I remember some presentation where SDL developer strongly advised against statically linking the library for the very reasons you have mentioned.
What OP is asking, even if as a proof of concept, can be done on both technical and legal basis.
[Solved] Too Many DLLS
-
Positive07
- Party member
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2012 4:34 pm
- Location: Argentina
Re: Too Many DLLS
On a note to this, you need the lua.dll in order to link Lua Binary modules to LÖVE, so for example if you want to use LuaSec, LuaFilesystem, LPeg, LuaZipWriter (to mention a few) you need it!slime wrote: The Lua .dll provided with LÖVE is actually LuaJIT, and it too can be swapped out with an updated version (e.g. LuaJIT 2.1-alpha). It can also be swapped out with standard Lua 5.1.
for i, person in ipairs(everybody) do
[tab]if not person.obey then person:setObey(true) end
end
love.system.openURL(github.com/pablomayobre)
[tab]if not person.obey then person:setObey(true) end
end
love.system.openURL(github.com/pablomayobre)
Re: Too Many DLLS
Well I guess I have to live with it.. Thanks for your replies y'all
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeooow!!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 1 guest