[Solved] Too Many DLLS
[Solved] Too Many DLLS
They're just too many for a small game.. Can't I just combine them all together or hide them?
Last edited by NickRock on Wed Aug 12, 2015 7:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeooow!!
- zorg
- Party member
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:55 pm
- Location: Absurdistan, Hungary
- Contact:
Re: Too Many DLLS
You can set the files' attributes to hidden, on windows at least. (though some people prefer seeing even hidden and system files, can't help that)
Though i've seen very small games with more external libs than löve
Though i've seen very small games with more external libs than löve
Me and my stuff True Neutral Aspirant. Why, yes, i do indeed enjoy sarcastically correcting others when they make the most blatant of spelling mistakes. No bullying or trolling the innocent tho.
Re: Too Many DLLS
Can I at least put them on a separate folder?
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeooow!!
- zorg
- Party member
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:55 pm
- Location: Absurdistan, Hungary
- Contact:
Re: Too Many DLLS
My best guess is, you would need to compile löve from source, and specify that the dll-s are in a subfolder, though i haven't tested it.
Me and my stuff True Neutral Aspirant. Why, yes, i do indeed enjoy sarcastically correcting others when they make the most blatant of spelling mistakes. No bullying or trolling the innocent tho.
-
- Prole
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 3:08 am
- Location: baku azerbaijan
- Contact:
i have made another thread for this check at https://love2d.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=80556
Last edited by DhruvCollins on Thu Sep 17, 2020 1:35 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Too Many DLLS
I've uploaded the combined LOVE and the dependencies here.
Re: Too Many DLLS
That sounds illegal. The .dll files are separated because their licenses require them to be replaceable unless everything is open source, IIRC.Ortimh wrote:I've uploaded the combined LOVE and the dependencies here.
My game called Hat Cat and the Obvious Crimes Against the Fundamental Laws of Physics is out now!
- Positive07
- Party member
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2012 4:34 pm
- Location: Argentina
Re: Too Many DLLS
Well not illegal if the project is open source and users can get a way to "build" everything, as discussed hereT-Bone wrote:That sounds illegal. The .dll files are separated because their licenses require them to be replaceable unless everything is open source, IIRC.Ortimh wrote:I've uploaded the combined LOVE and the dependencies here.
for i, person in ipairs(everybody) do
[tab]if not person.obey then person:setObey(true) end
end
love.system.openURL(github.com/pablomayobre)
[tab]if not person.obey then person:setObey(true) end
end
love.system.openURL(github.com/pablomayobre)
Re: Too Many DLLS
Everything except OpenAL Soft and libmpg123 can be combined with almost no restrictions (license text must be included somewhere). libmpg123 is optional, you don't need it if you don't use mp3 files. Therefore, you can go down to one exe and one dll total, if that's aesthetically better for you.
- slime
- Solid Snayke
- Posts: 3166
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:45 am
- Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Too Many DLLS
DevIL is also LGPL.foo0 wrote:Everything except OpenAL Soft and libmpg123 can be combined with almost no restrictions (license text must be included somewhere).
Microsoft generally recommends against statically linking the Visual C/C++ libraries.
In SDL2's case it's useful in practice to be able to swap out the SDL2.dll for a newer / different one with fixes or changes. Doing so has fixed issues for people numerous times already.
The Lua .dll provided with LÖVE is actually LuaJIT, and it too can be swapped out with an updated version (e.g. LuaJIT 2.1-alpha). It can also be swapped out with standard Lua 5.1.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests