Someone already did. lolI~=Spam wrote:As a small counter-argument the entire (or at least most of it) LOVE API could be written with the ffi but that doesn't mean we shouldn't.S0lll0s wrote:both of these can be archieved with the ffi afaik. I'm not sure whether microphone input can be abstracted/simplified to a level that matches the rest of the LÖVE Api whilst keeping it variable enough to actually be useful.
A few suggestions for Löve 0.10.0
Re: A few suggestions for Löve 0.10.0
Re: A few suggestions for Löve 0.10.0
...which is where my second argument comes in.I~=Spam wrote:As a small counter-argument the entire (or at least most of it) LOVE API could be written with the ffi but that doesn't mean we shouldn't.S0lll0s wrote:both of these can be archieved with the ffi afaik. I'm not sure whether microphone input can be abstracted/simplified to a level that matches the rest of the LÖVE Api whilst keeping it variable enough to actually be useful.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 4 guests