No. The program was written in C, and I have abandoned it along with the PC it was on. I didn't backed it up online because I thought the whole project (genetic transform of software that would control uniform robots to get optimal behavior) was too complex for me to handle and random program generator (for initial population, and random mutations) isn't much use elsewhere.Can you post a .love that demonstrates this? I'd like to understand what you mean by patterns.
By patterns I mean sequences of same programs. Given estimated math probability of that two randomly generated programs would be the same is like probability of Earth collapsing into a black hole, I expected every program to be unique. But reality was that there were same programs, and they formed a pattern of such. Imagine if you represent a program with a color, and you draw those colors in a line, then there would be a pattern.
Random has no math definition. It only has lexical definition, as a value cast outcome that you can't predict in any way.I was asking for a proper definition and would have accepted a number of answers (e.g. "high entropy", "uniformly distributed"). But not a vague feeling, come on.
Wikipedia reads "Commonly, it means lack of pattern or predictability in events."
Reminds me of estimating terminal running velocity of a "shperical horse in a vacuum". It's widely known in russia, but you might not ever heard of it. It means that you can't apply these assumptions and simplifications, these don't work IRL.All assumptions have been carefully considered and are valid within reason.