Never mind, require works just fine!
Thank you!
Search found 3 matches
- Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:15 pm
- Forum: Support and Development
- Topic: love.filesystem.include and love.filesystem.require for 0.6
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5140
- Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:14 pm
- Forum: Support and Development
- Topic: love.filesystem.include and love.filesystem.require for 0.6
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5140
Re: love.filesystem.include and love.filesystem.require for 0.6
Ah, thank you. I had forgotten to remove the '.lua' suffix, and didn't bother reading the error message properly.
Now.. er, how about 'include'? Just use require, perhaps?
I tried dofile, but it keeps saying the file does not exist (both with and without the extension).
Now.. er, how about 'include'? Just use require, perhaps?
I tried dofile, but it keeps saying the file does not exist (both with and without the extension).
- Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:26 am
- Forum: Support and Development
- Topic: love.filesystem.include and love.filesystem.require for 0.6
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5140
love.filesystem.include and love.filesystem.require for 0.6
Howdy. I've searched everywhere I could think of . However, I could not find an answer to my questions. Is there a way to include files and require modules in 0.6? love.filesystem.include and love.filesystem.require no longer exist, and the global include and require functions never existed. Help, p...