kikito wrote:... I'll give it a run next weekend.

Good, by then it could already have some features

FierceForm wrote:Feature recommendation...

I'm not familiar with this one yet. And right now I'm all hasty about class-support, so I'll leave this one for later time.

Voted #4. I was going to add '#2 would be good too', but then I've read the posts above me and got reminded of the multiple inheritance. I prefer function to form, so 4 is the way to go for me. And I'm also cautious on performance topic - I remember reading a book on C++ saying: 'Designers of the la...

Hello all lövers, though Lua isn't technically object oriented, I've been allways using it that way. And because I have also experience with Java and C++, I've always wished to document my Lua code the same way as I did with those languages. But LuaDoc didn't help me very much with it - it was creat...

Robin wrote:Box2D's units are meters. love.physics's are pixels (where the default is 30 px/m).
You can change the scale with this function.

Ah, this explains everything - I thought the entered values went directly to Box2D.

Problem solved. Thanks.

Hello. I'm getting assert failures when creating love.physics shapes. I tried to figure out the reason, but I failed. The fact is, the failure appears when trying to create a very small or thin shapes. My test script: function love.load() local world = love.physics.newWorld(0,0,100,100,0,0,true); lo...

... is this the same with previous versions? Dunno, I've only used two recent hg sources, the official source tarball didn't compile for me (build script error). About the fonts... they are prerendered Really? :shock: Why is that so? Is it the performance of rendering itself, or something else? Bec...

...fonts are heavier than you might think What do you mean? I checked out the fonts on my system and none had more than 1MB May I ask how you measured this...? I just ran "love game_dir" on the console and htop on the other. Note that the numbers represent disk cache which gets counted in...

Hello everybody, I'm running LOVE on Fedora 13 and I'm experiencing a quite peculiar behaviour - massive usage of disk cache. Memory consumption of the LOVE process itself is minimal, but the amount of disk space mapped to the process is gigantic. Just check out these few tests I ran. I'm using rece...

bartbes wrote:Well, 0.6.2 had baseline drawing, and current hg (not svn, mind you!) has top-left, you observed well.

I forgot to specify the versions

Windows - 0.6.2 stable download
Fedora - recent svn