[removed]

Eric Matyas wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2017 12:12 am I'm not really referring to my "arbitrary moral standards" as much as the legal definition.

'legal definition' depends on a specific jurisdiction.. in what country do u live that has a legal definition of obscenity?

people create and share things and are free to give them a name of their choice. they don't have to make sense and they don't require your approval. imma write a lib named FÜCK just to spite you and your entitlement lol

why are there multiple identical threads for this? wouldnt one thread suffice

Tjakka5 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:37 pmIm not agains't "Love related" library names, as long as they make sense.

you from the library name police?

yeah its a nice concept but the presentation needs work

The point of it is that I simply don't want my work in anything obscene or pornographic. your thread's title is "Building a Library of Images for Everyone" not "Building a Library of Images for Everyone except those who don't conform to my arbitrary personal moral standards" tho...

there are webservers that don't support the header request
most do but some special/customized servers don't

yea, sorry for the bad and broken code, atleast it works now and actually does what it's supposed to no its slow and unnecessarily complicated and does redefine what true means you know that anything ~= nil and false is supposed to be true right its still bad code why not just take the function gru...

not sure why there even is a 'bad code' forum. there's a such think as broken or non-working code, but 'bad code' isn't. everyone thinks and therefor tackles problems differently then others, my original code was terrible because I posted it without testing it out (was going to edit it after testin...