After a bit of testing it does seem objects of a type share the same metatable so that works.

I am creating an API with editable properties and would like to have basic type checking in it. For regular Lua values this is simple enough but I can't find a way to check if a value is a LÖVE object. I thought to extract Object:typeOf for this but calling it with non LÖVE objects actually causes t...

Where might LOVE be installed at on those platforms?

I am creating a LOVE utility tool but only have access to Windows.

pgimeno wrote:I think you want [wiki]Font:getWrap[/wiki].

Edit: In particular, [wiki]Font:getHeight[/wiki]() * #lines where lines is the second value returned by Font:getWrap().

That works perfectly! Thanks.

Is there a reasonable way to get how much love.graphics.printf will wrap?

I am well aware of what happens behind the scenes. I am just saying for "scripting end" coding I prefer simple systems that are easy to wrap around and make custom systems rather than systems like Gideros and Corona SDK have.

Ah! I skipped right over that when searching the wiki.

airstruck wrote:

Take a look at the example here.

I would much rather have the love.keypressed,love.mousepressed, etc callbacks.

Hmm? I would rather not make a custom keyboard.

So much better to wrap around a callback event system than some OO listener system.